Cast Your Vote:

    • Ban -- Votes: 149
    • Do Not Ban -- Votes: 20
user banned Due February 2; 4 kids; 2 angel babies; Madagascar, WI, Madagascar 2200 posts
May 4th '15

Quoting Kaleighshaleigh:
I guess I'm "one of those" too. What's wrong with not cussing? 


exactly!

Kaleighshaleigh 3 kids; USA 7100 posts
May 4th '15

Quoting SaffyLiz:
It's one thing to not cuss.  It's totally cool.  Different strokes for different folks and all.

It's an issue when you use it to give yourself airs and feel morally superior to others.


Gottcha...

MotherFalcon Seidkona Due October 23; 2 kids; Fólkvangr, YD, Sweden 6714 posts
May 4th '15

Quoting SaffyLiz:
It's one thing to not cuss.  It's totally cool.  Different strokes for different folks and all.

It's an issue when you use it to give yourself airs and feel morally superior to others.


you have to be smart and avoid the airs, like me. otherwise you end up blowing some air up your own ass.

Stanford PA 2 kids; Tulare, CA, United States 2981 posts
May 4th '15

Ban. This is what happen when you name your kid Lorcan BANning Lee. 

Have Heart 2 kids; 2 angel babies; Western, NY, United States 9013 posts
May 4th '15

Quoting Stanford PA:
Ban. This is what happen when you name your kid Lorcan BANning Lee. 



shhhhhh, its not made up, its not common & its spelled correctly.... gosh! 

Kaleighshaleigh 3 kids; USA 7100 posts
May 4th '15

Quoting JΔ$:

If you don't know the purpose of the ban poll then either ask or be quiet. You're talking in circles here.


Enlighten me...What's the point?

Stanford PA 2 kids; Tulare, CA, United States 2981 posts
May 4th '15

Quoting Bentley Calls Me Mom <3:


shhhhhh, its not made up, its not common & its spelled correctly.... gosh! 



I guess, I can take my opinion and go shove it up my ass. She doesn't want to hear it.

Kaleighshaleigh 3 kids; USA 7100 posts
May 4th '15

Quoting JΔ$:

The point of a ban poll is to bring up a situation that isn't against the rules but that could put the community in danger in regards to their privacy, in this case. As someone else stated, just because it isn't against the rules, doesn't negate from the fact that action needs to be taken since Dragon Lady aka Lorcan's Mom has a history of messaging family/friends on Facebook. 

So, for anyone who is reading this. Don't do slick shit just because it isn't written in the rules. Everything is up for banning.


So do these polls actually change anything or is it just a place for people to post 9 plus pages of comments bad mouthing someone they believe mistreated them or others and validates their feeling of wanting a particular person banned? 

Jennifer SG TTC since Aug 2015; Montreal, Quebec 8466 posts
May 4th '15

Quoting Kaleighshaleigh:

So do these polls actually change anything or is it just a place for people to post 9 plus pages of comments bad mouthing someone they believe mistreated them or others and validates their feeling of wanting a particular person banned? 


Yes they do. They bring up concerns and even sometimes can result in a  positive change for the site that ensures safety and a happier place to be. 
This isn't just a site, its a community. And when something happens, its important to let the community know and give them a space to communicate and a place for me (the admin) to follow. 

As JAS mentioned, the point to a Ban thread is because an event happened that is not in the rules but could affect the members here negatively. Even if your vote (which stays anonymous) is not with the majority, its also a great reminder to be careful about what you post and know that there is someone on the site currently who is taking information. 

Lauralie_89 4 kids; United States 1066 posts
May 4th '15
Quoting Stanford PA:


I guess, I can take my opinion and go shove it up my ass. She doesn't want to hear it.


38

Evil Dr.PorkChop 4 kids; 1 angel baby; Concord, NC, United States 1343 posts
May 4th '15

What about the people who thought it was funny and/or encouraged the offense at the time? 

Nicola. 2 kids; Manton, MI, United States 13426 posts
May 4th '15

Assuming she has been warned in the past that this behavior is not acceptable, she should be banned. Not only is messaging people on FB a shitty thing to do, it could definitely put someone in harm's way. She has never personally bothered me but I do think this situation over steps the boundaries.

If the past behaviors/incidents have not been brought up to her or if she has not been given a warning about her behavior, then I think she should be given the final warning. Any questionable actions and then she is gone.

Stanford PA 2 kids; Tulare, CA, United States 2981 posts
May 4th '15

Quoting Ladee+Grant+Lilly:

I would just say that that was in poor taste, however because they actually did not commit any known "offense" that it would be frowned upon but not necessarily ban worthy


Exclamation 

♡☆º×ß¡±©µ×º☆♡ 4 kids; 1 angel baby; Centralia, Wa, United States 49858 posts
May 4th '15

Quoting °Jessica Fletcher°:

I would be left, and I know of others as well.im dissapponted seeing women come here for help and are ripped to shreds, some who never return afterward. this should be a woman helping woman site. with all the poison venom floating on BG . IM NOT SUPRISED IT got carried over to another site.


This is a parenting site it's not just for women 

♡☆º×ß¡±©µ×º☆♡ 4 kids; 1 angel baby; Centralia, Wa, United States 49858 posts
May 4th '15

Quoting Nikki Tickerhoof:
Honest question, is there anyway her profile could of been hacked? I mean yes the behavior is unacceptable and if her profile wasn't hacked then I'd say ban her. 


She's a dumb c**t her shit wasn't hacked